REFERENCES
1. Arneth A, Sitch S, Pongratz J, et al. Historical carbon dioxide emissions caused by land-use changes are possibly larger than assumed. Nat Geosci 2017;10:79-84.
2. Liu LX, Fu J, Jiang LP, Zhang JR, Zhu W, Lin Y. Highly efficient photoelectrochemical reduction of CO2 at low applied voltage using 3D Co-Pi/BiVO4/SnO2 nanosheet array photoanodes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019;11:26024-31.
4. Liu J, Fu J, Zhou Y, Zhu W, Jiang LP, Lin Y. Controlled synthesis of EDTA-modified porous hollow copper microspheres for high-efficiency conversion of CO2 to multicarbon products. Nano Lett 2020;20:4823-8.
5. Liu J, Cai Y, Song R, et al. Recent progress on single-atom catalysts for CO2 electroreduction. Mater Today 2021;48:95-114.
6. Salemdeeb R, Saint R, Clark W, Lenaghan M, Pratt K, Millar F. A pragmatic and industry-oriented framework for data quality assessment of environmental footprint tools. Resour Environ Sustain 2021;3:100019.
7. Dou X, Wang Y, Ciais P, et al. Near-real-time global gridded daily CO2 emissions. Innovation 2022;3:100182.
8. Du H, Liu LX, Li P, et al. Enriching reaction intermediates in multishell structured copper catalysts for boosted propanol electrosynthesis from carbon monoxide. ACS Nano 2023;17:8663-70.
9. Zhao Q, Yu P, Mahendran R, et al. Global climate change and human health: pathways and possible solutions. Eco-Environ Health 2022;1:53-62.
10. Fu J, Li P, Lin Y, et al. Fight for carbon neutrality with state-of-the-art negative carbon emission technologies. Eco-Environ Health 2022;1:259-79.
11. Li K, Cai Y, Yang X, et al. H2S Involved photocatalytic system: a novel syngas production strategy by boosting the photoreduction of CO2 while recovering hydrogen from the environmental toxicant. Adv Funct Mater 2022;32:2113002.
12. Yang X, Li K, Wang G, et al. 2D Catalysts for CO2 photoreduction: discussing structure efficiency strategies and prospects for scaled production based on current progress. Chemistry 2022;28:e202201881.
13. Ran J, Jaroniec M, Qiao SZ. Cocatalysts in semiconductor-based photocatalytic CO2 reduction: achievements, challenges, and opportunities. Adv Mater 2018;30:1704649.
14. Fu J, Jiang K, Qiu X, Yu J, Liu M. Product selectivity of photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions. Mater Today 2020;32:222-43.
16. Tian J, Zhong K, Zhu X, et al. Highly exposed active sites of Au nanoclusters for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Chem Eng J 2023;451:138392.
17. Yang J, Yang Z, Yang K, et al. Indium-based ternary metal sulfide for photocatalytic CO2 reduction application. Chin J Catal 2023;44:67-95.
18. Zhu L, Hu F, Sun B, Gu S, Gao T, Zhou G. Recent advances on multivariate MOFs for photocatalytic CO2 reduction and H2 evolution. Adv Sustain Syst 2023;7:2200394.
19. Zhu Z, Xuan Y, Liu X, Zhu Q. Revealing the stochastic kinetics evolution of photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Nanoscale 2023;15:730-41.
20. Zuo Q, Cui R, Wang L, et al. High-loading single cobalt atoms on ultrathin MOF nanosheets for efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Sci China Chem 2023;66:570-7.
21. Liu H, Zhu Y, Ma J, Zhang Z, Hu W. Recent advances in atomic-level engineering of nanostructured catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Adv Funct Mater 2020;30:1910534.
22. He L, Yuan J, Xia N, et al. Kernel tuning and nonuniform influence on optical and electrochemical gaps of bimetal nanoclusters. J Am Chem Soc 2018;140:3487-90.
23. Bootharaju MS, Baek W, Lee S, Chang H, Kim J, Hyeon T. Magic-sized stoichiometric II-VI nanoclusters. Small 2021;17:e2002067.
24. Busatto S, de Mello Donega C. Magic-size semiconductor nanostructures: where does the magic come from? ACS Mater Au 2022;2:237-49.
25. Wang Y, Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Buhro WE. Magic-size II-VI nanoclusters as synthons for flat colloidal nanocrystals. Inorg Chem 2015;54:1165-77.
26. Kurashige W, Kumazawa R, Ishii D, et al. Au25-loaded BaLa4Ti4O15 water-splitting photocatalyst with enhanced activity and durability produced using new chromium oxide shell formation method. J Phys Chem C 2018;122:13669-81.
27. Gautam A, Gore PM, Kandasubramanian B. Nanocluster materials in photosynthetic machines. Chem Eng J 2020;385:123951.
28. Nitopi S, Bertheussen E, Scott SB, et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem Rev 2019;119:7610-72.
29. Shoji S, Yin G, Nishikawa M, Atarashi D, Sakai E, Miyauchi M. Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 by CuO nanocluster loaded SrTiO3 nanorod thin film. Chem Phys Lett 2016;658:309-14.
30. Gao Y, Sun L, Bian J, Zhang Z, Li Z, Jing L. Accelerated charge transfer of g-C3N4/BiVO4 Z-scheme 2D heterojunctions by controllably introducing phosphate bridges and Ag nanocluster co-catalysts for selective CO2 photoreduction to CO. Appl Surf Sci 2023;610:155360.
31. Bo Y, Du P, Li H, et al. Bridging Au nanoclusters with ultrathin LDH nanosheets via ligands for enhanced charge transfer in photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Appl Catal B Environ 2023;330:122667.
32. Chen J, Zhang QF, Bonaccorso TA, Williard PG, Wang LS. Controlling gold nanoclusters by diphospine ligands. J Am Chem Soc 2014;136:92-5.
33. Zhu Q, Huang X, Zeng Y, et al. Controllable synthesis and electrocatalytic applications of atomically precise gold nanoclusters. Nanoscale Adv 2021;3:6330-41.
34. Liu L, Corma A. Metal Catalysts for heterogeneous catalysis: from single atoms to nanoclusters and nanoparticles. Chem Rev 2018;118:4981-5079.
35. Chakraborty I, Pradeep T. Atomically precise clusters of noble metals: emerging link between atoms and nanoparticles. Chem Rev 2017;117:8208-71.
36. Lu H, Chen B, Li Y, et al. Benzyl-rich ligand engineering of the photostability of atomically precise gold nanoclusters. Chem Commun 2022;58:2395-8.
37. Fang J, Zhang B, Yao Q, Yang Y, Xie J, Yan N. Recent advances in the synthesis and catalytic applications of ligand-protected, atomically precise metal nanoclusters. Coord Chem Rev 2016;322:1-29.
38. Chai OJH, Liu Z, Chen T, Xie J. Engineering ultrasmall metal nanoclusters for photocatalytic and electrocatalytic applications. Nanoscale 2019;11:20437-48.
39. Sun Y, Cai X, Hu W, Liu X, Zhu Y. Electrocatalytic and photocatalytic applications of atomically precise gold-based nanoclusters. Sci China Chem 2021;64:1065-75.
40. Wu J, Xia W, Lan M, et al. Artificial photosynthetic assemblies constructed by the self-assembly of synthetic building blocks for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J Mater Chem A 2020;8:21690-9.
41. Yao Q, Chen T, Yuan X, Xie J. Toward total synthesis of thiolate-protected metal nanoclusters. ACC Chem Res 2018;51:1338-48.
42. Luo Z, Nachammai V, Zhang B, et al. Toward understanding the growth mechanism: tracing all stable intermediate species from reduction of Au(I)-thiolate complexes to evolution of Au25 nanoclusters. J Am Chem Soc 2014;136:10577-80.
43. Yao Q, Yuan X, Fung V, et al. Understanding seed-mediated growth of gold nanoclusters at molecular level. Nat Commun 2017;8:927.
44. Wang S, Li Q, Kang X, Zhu M. Customizing the structure, composition, and properties of alloy nanoclusters by metal exchange. ACC Chem Res 2018;51:2784-92.
45. Li Y, Zhou M, Jin R. Programmable metal nanoclusters with atomic precision. Adv Mater 2021;33:e2006591.
46. Li G, Jin R. Atomically precise gold nanoclusters as new model catalysts. ACC Chem Res 2013;46:1749-58.
47. Zhou M, Higaki T, Li Y, et al. Three-stage evolution from nonscalable to scalable optical properties of thiolate-protected gold nanoclusters. J Am Chem Soc 2019;141:19754-64.
48. Pan H, Heagy MD. Photons to formate-a review on photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to formic acid. Nanomaterials 2020;10:2422.
49. Linsebigler AL, Lu G, Yates JT. Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results. Chem Rev 1995;95:735-58.
50. Habisreutinger SN, Schmidt-mende L, Stolarczyk JK. Photokatalytische reduktion von CO2 an TiO2 und anderen halbleitern. Angew Chem Int Ed 2013;125:7516-57.
51. Yan J, Teo BK, Zheng N. Surface chemistry of atomically precise coinage-metal nanoclusters: from structural control to surface reactivity and catalysis. ACC Chem Res 2018;51:3084-93.
52. Hou B, Kim B, Lee HKH, et al. Multiphoton absorption stimulated metal chalcogenide quantum dot solar cells under ambient and concentrated irradiance. Adv Funct Mater 2020;30:2004563.
53. Guo K, Zhu X, Peng L, et al. Boosting photocatalytic CO2 reduction over a covalent organic framework decorated with ruthenium nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 2021;405:127011.
54. Kuhl KP, Cave ER, Abram DN, Jaramillo TF. New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces. Energy Environ Sci 2012;5:7050.
55. Zhou M, Wang S, Yang P, Huang C, Wang X. Boron carbon nitride semiconductors decorated with CdS nanoparticles for photocatalytic reduction of CO2. ACS Catal 2018;8:4928-36.
56. Nguyen D, Nguyen C, Do T. Rational one-step synthesis of cobalt clusters embedded-graphitic carbon nitrides for the efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction under ambient conditions. J Catal 2020;392:88-96.
57. Hansen HA, Varley JB, Peterson AA, Nørskov JK. Understanding trends in the electrocatalytic activity of metals and enzymes for CO2 reduction to CO. J Phys Chem Lett 2013;4:388-92.
58. Rosen BA, Salehi-Khojin A, Thorson MR, et al. Ionic liquid-mediated selective conversion of CO2 to CO at low overpotentials. Science 2011;334:643-4.
59. Palencia C, Yu K, Boldt K. The future of colloidal semiconductor magic-size clusters. ACS Nano 2020;14:1227-35.
60. Chang X, Wang T, Gong J. CO2 photo-reduction: insights into CO2 activation and reaction on surfaces of photocatalysts. Energy Environ Sci 2016;9:2177-96.
61. Peng S, Zeng X, Li Y. Titanate nanotube modified with different nickel precursors for enhanced Eosin Y-sensitized photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Int J Hydrog Energy 2015;40:6038-49.
62. Zhang W, Li Y, Zeng X, Peng S. Synergetic effect of metal nickel and graphene as a cocatalyst for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution via dye sensitization. Sci Rep 2015;5:10589.
63. Li Y, Xiang Y, Peng S, Wang X, Zhou L. Modification of Zr-doped titania nanotube arrays by urea pyrolysis for enhanced visible-light photoelectrochemical H2 generation. Electrochim Acta 2013;87:794-800.
64. Yin G, Nishikawa M, Nosaka Y, et al. Photocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction by copper oxide nanocluster-grafted niobate nanosheets. ACS Nano 2015;9:2111-9.
65. Park D, Jeong Y, Lee J, Lee J, Moon S. Interfacial charge-transfer loss in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem C 2013;117:2734-9.
66. Irie H, Miura S, Kamiya K, Hashimoto K. Efficient visible light-sensitive photocatalysts: Grafting Cu(II) ions onto TiO2 and WO3 photocatalysts. Chem Phys Lett 2008;457:202-5.
67. Irie H, Kamiya K, Shibanuma T, et al. Visible light-sensitive Cu(II)-grafted TiO2 photocatalysts: activities and X-ray absorption fine structure analyses. J Phys Chem C 2009;113:10761-6.
68. Yu H, Irie H, Shimodaira Y, et al. An efficient visible-light-sensitive Fe(III)-grafted TiO2 photocatalyst. J Phys Chem C 2010;114:16481-7.
69. Liu M, Qiu X, Hashimoto K, Miyauchi M. Cu(II) nanocluster-grafted, Nb-doped TiO2 as an efficient visible-light-sensitive photocatalyst based on energy-level matching between surface and bulk states. J Mater Chem A 2014;2:13571-9.
70. Miyauchi M, Irie H, Liu M, et al. Visible-light-sensitive photocatalysts: nanocluster-grafted titanium dioxide for indoor environmental remediation. J Phys Chem Lett 2016;7:75-84.
71. Kong L, Wang C, Wan F, Zheng H, Zhang X. Synergistic effect of surface self-doping and Fe species-grafting for enhanced photocatalytic activity of TiO2 under visible-light. Appl Surf Sci 2017;396:26-35.
72. Ji Y, Luo Y. New Mechanism for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 on the anatase TiO2 (101) surface: the essential role of oxygen vacancy. J Am Chem Soc 2016;138:15896-902.
73. Nolan M, Iwaszuk A, Gray KA. Localization of photoexcited electrons and holes on low coordinated Ti and O sites in free and supported TiO2 nanoclusters. J Phys Chem C 2014;118:27890-900.
74. Hurum D, Agrios A, Crist S, Gray K, Rajh T, Thurnauer M. Probing reaction mechanisms in mixed phase TiO2 by EPR. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena 2006;150:155-63.
75. Li G, Gray KA. The solid-solid interface: explaining the high and unique photocatalytic reactivity of TiO2-based nanocomposite materials. Chem Phys 2007;339:173-87.
77. Liu M, Qiu X, Miyauchi M, Hashimoto K. Energy-level matching of Fe(III) ions grafted at surface and doped in bulk for efficient visible-light photocatalysts. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135:10064-72.
78. Liu M, Sunada K, Hashimoto K, Miyauchi M. Visible-light sensitive Cu(II)-TiO2 with sustained anti-viral activity for efficient indoor environmental remediation. J Mater Chem A 2015;3:17312-9.
79. Liu M, Inde R, Nishikawa M, et al. Enhanced photoactivity with nanocluster-grafted titanium dioxide photocatalysts. ACS Nano 2014;8:7229-38.
80. Cheng L, Li B, Yin H, Fan J, Xiang Q. Cu clusters immobilized on Cd-defective cadmium sulfide nano-rods towards photocatalytic CO2 reduction. J Mater Sci Technol 2022;118:54-63.
81. Billo T, Fu FY, Raghunath P, et al. Ni-nanocluster modified black TiO2 with dual active sites for selective photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Small 2018;14:1702928.
82. Li Y, Wang C, Song M, Li D, Zhang X, Liu Y. TiO2-x/CoOx photocatalyst sparkles in photothermocatalytic reduction of CO2 with
83. Hou T, Luo N, Cui Y, et al. Selective reduction of CO2 to CO under visible light by controlling coordination structures of CeOx-S/ZnIn2S4 hybrid catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 2019;245:262-70.
84. Mrowetz M, Villa A, Prati L, Selli E. Effects of Au nanoparticles on TiO2 in the photocatalytic degradation of an azo dye. Gold Bull 2007;40:154-60.
85. Yadav A, Li Y, Liao TW, et al. Enhanced methanol electro-oxidation activity of nanoclustered gold. Small 2021;17:e2004541.
86. Liao TW, Verbruggen SW, Claes N, et al. TiO2 films modified with Au nanoclusters as self-cleaning surfaces under visible light. Nanomaterials 2018;8:30.
87. Li Y, Yang Y, Chen G, Fan J, Xiang Q. Au cluster anchored on TiO2/Ti3C2 hybrid composites for efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Rare Met 2022;41:3045-59.
88. Xiao FX, Zeng Z, Hsu SH, Hung SF, Chen HM, Liu B. Light-induced
89. Liu S, Xu YJ. Photo-induced transformation process at gold clusters-semiconductor interface: implications for the complexity of gold clusters-based photocatalysis. Sci Rep 2016;6:22742.
90. Zhou P, Yu J, Jaroniec M. All-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic systems. Adv Mater 2014;26:4920-35.
91. Bard AJ. Photoelectrochemistry and heterogeneous photo-catalysis at semiconductors. J Photochem 1979;10:59-75.
92. Li H, Tu W, Zhou Y, Zou Z. Z-scheme photocatalytic systems for promoting photocatalytic performance: recent progress and future challenges. Adv Sci 2016;3:1500389.
93. Maeda K. Z-scheme water splitting using two different semiconductor photocatalysts. ACS Catal 2013;3:1486-503.
94. Xu Q, Zhang L, Cheng B, Fan J, Yu J. S-scheme heterojunction photocatalyst. Chem 2020;6:1543-59.
95. Deng Y, Zhang Z, Du P, et al. Embedding ultrasmall Au clusters into the pores of a covalent organic framework for enhanced photostability and photocatalytic performance. Angew Chem Int Ed 2020;132:6138-45.
96. Xu Q, Wageh S, Al-ghamdi AA, Li X. Design principle of S-scheme heterojunction photocatalyst. J Mater Sci Technol 2022;124:171-3.
97. Li X, Xiong J, Gao X, et al. Novel BP/BiOBr S-scheme nano-heterojunction for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic tetracycline removal and oxygen evolution activity. J Hazard Mater 2020;387:121690.
98. Xia P, Cao S, Zhu B, et al. Designing a 0D/2D S-scheme heterojunction over polymeric carbon nitride for visible-light photocatalytic inactivation of bacteria. Angew Chem Int Ed 2020;59:5218-25.
99. Xu F, Meng K, Cheng B, Wang S, Xu J, Yu J. Unique S-scheme heterojunctions in self-assembled TiO2/CsPbBr3 hybrids for CO2 photoreduction. Nat Commun 2020;11:4613.
100. Wageh S, A. Al-ghamdi A, Liu L. S-scheme heterojunction photocatalyst for CO2 photoreduction. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica 2021;37:2010024.
102. Ke X, Zhang J, Dai K, Fan K, Liang C. Integrated S-scheme heterojunction of amine-functionalized 1D CdSe nanorods anchoring on ultrathin 2D SnNb2O6 Nanosheets for robust solar-driven CO2 conversion. Solar RRL 2021;5:2000805.
104. Long JR, Yaghi OM. The pervasive chemistry of metal-organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 2009;38:1213-4.
105. Bernales V, Ortuño MA, Truhlar DG, Cramer CJ, Gagliardi L. Computational design of functionalized metal-organic framework nodes for catalysis. ACS Cent Sci 2018;4:5-19.
106. Choudhuri I, Truhlar DG. Photogenerated charge separation in a CdSe nanocluster encapsulated in a metal-organic framework for improved photocatalysis. J Phys Chem C 2020;124:8504-13.
107. Jiang Y, Yu Y, Zhang X, et al. N-heterocyclic carbene-stabilized ultrasmall gold nanoclusters in a metal-organic framework for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Angew Chem Int Ed 2021;60:17388-93.
108. Sakimoto KK, Kornienko N, Yang P. Cyborgian material design for solar fuel production: the emerging photosynthetic biohybrid systems. ACC Chem Res 2017;50:476-81.
