Functional muscle transfer for restoration of elbow flexion: a review
0
Abstract
Elbow flexion is essential to help position the hand in space and for functional use of the upper extremity. Loss of elbow function can be secondary to many etiologies, including but not limited to brachial plexus injury, traumatic muscle loss, oncologic treatment, poliomyelitis or congenital absence of motor function. The end result is a significant functional limitation of the upper extremity. One method to address the loss of elbow flexion is the use of a functional muscle transfer. These transfers can be performed as pedicled rotational transfers or free functional muscle transfers. This article reviews functional muscle transfers for restoration of elbow flexion as a treatment option for patients with an otherwise unreconstructable extremity.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Elbow flexion is considered one of the most important upper extremity motions to accomplish activities of daily living. As such, loss of elbow flexion significantly limits upper extremity function. These injuries may be caused by obstetric or traumatic brachial plexus injuries, elbow flexor muscle loss due to trauma or oncologic resection, brachial plexus damage from oncologic resection or radiation treatment, poliomyelitis, or congenital loss of elbow motion, as in arthrogryposis. When muscles required for elbow flexion (specifically biceps brachii and brachialis) are viable, nerve transfers or grafts may be an option for restoration of elbow flexion[1,2]. However, in cases of chronic injuries, muscle loss, atrophy, fibrosis, or extensive brachial plexus injury, nerve transfer or graft may not be sufficient to restore elbow flexion. In these cases, muscle transfer options should be considered[1]. Restoration of elbow flexion should be prioritized to restore function to the upper extremity, followed by finger flexion and finger extension[3]. In general, a single transferred muscle should provide a single function, though in the case of severe brachial plexus injury, this may be impossible due to limited numbers of donor nerves[3].
INDICATIONS
A pedicled latissimus transfer for restoration of elbow function was first described by Schottstaedt et al. in 1955 and Hovnanian in 1956[4,5]. Since that time, numerous studies have examined various options for functional muscle transfers. Free muscle functional muscle transfers were used by Manktelow and McKee in 1978 and Zuker et al. in 1991 to restore upper extremity function[6,7]. As techniques have progressed, functional muscle transfers can now be used for restoration of shoulder flexion, elbow flexion, elbow extension, finger flexion, finger extension, and thumb motion, either in isolation or in combination to restore muscle functions[8-10] .
Patients who are being considered for functional muscle transfer must be motivated and willing to perform the extensive postoperative therapy and rehabilitation required for maximizing function. The recipient site requires full passive motion at the joint the transfer will move, in addition to a soft tissue bed conducive to muscle and tendon gliding. Healthy donor nerves and vessels are required. Functional muscle transfer should be used when no nerve or tendon transfer options are available. Patient age is an additional factor to consider -- while children are more likely to have successful restoration of motor function, there may be a mismatch in growth between the transferred muscle and the humerus, potentially leading to elbow contracture as the child reaches skeletal maturity[9]. Stevanovic and Sharpe recommend an age limit of 45 years old for free functional muscle transfers to optimize recovery of motor function[9]. However, Doi et al. showed success after free functional muscle transfer in patients aged 62 years old and younger, while
DONOR MUSCLES
Several donor muscle options are available for restoration of elbow flexion. In the setting of vascular compromise from trauma or irradiation, a pedicled latissimus is preferred to restore elbow flexion without the need for an arterial anastomosis. The pedicled transfer is technically less challenging as it does not require a microvascular anastomosis. When a free flap is required, such as in the case of poor ipsilateral latissimus function, the gracilis is the most commonly used donor muscle. The gracilis has a redundant function in the lower extremity, making it more suitable for transfer than other lower extremity donor muscles. Its size and excursion make it ideal for restoration of upper extremity function, where it may be used in the forearm for restoring wrist or digit flexion or extension, or in the upper arm for restoring elbow flexion.
Latissimus dorsi (pedicled)
The latissimus dorsi muscle is a versatile option for restoring elbow flexion. It can be performed as a rotational muscle transfer or free functional muscle transfer from either the ipsilateral or contralateral side. Prior to surgery, the function of the latissimus muscle must be tested to ensure the transferred muscle can adequately power elbow flexion, as described by Stevanovic et al.[13]. The latissimus dorsi is evaluated by palpating or gently pinching the muscle at the posterior axillary fold during adduction, extension, and internal rotation of the arm. The patient may also be asked to cough while the clinician holds the posterior axillary fold to palpate muscle contraction. Patients may also perform exercises with a physical therapist prior to surgery to maximize the strength of the latissimus dorsi muscle.
A pedicled transfer has the advantage of not requiring microsurgical anastomoses. The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position, and the entire upper extremity, along with the lateral side from the shoulder girdle to the pelvis, is included in the surgical field. As described in prior studies, the defect in the anterior arm is measured along with the distance from the proximal aspect of the planned incision to the coracoid. This measurement is used to plan the skin paddle location relative to the axis of rotation to ensure coverage of the arm soft tissue[13]. The incision is made from the posterior axillary fold to the midpoint of the iliac crest, allowing identification and exposure of the latissimus dorsi [Figure 1]. With the latissimus in the stretched position (abduction, forward flexion, and external rotation of the arm), marking sutures may be placed at 5 cm intervals along the latissimus prior to mobilization to use for setting tension at the recipient site[13,14]. The latissimus dorsi muscle is then elevated off the thoracic wall, with care to avoid injury to the thoracodorsal artery pedicle, which enters the muscle 10-12 cm from the axilla[14]. The thoracodorsal nerve is also protected to maintain innervation to the transferred muscle [Figure 2]. The serratus anterior can be elevated along with the latissimus dorsi as a chimeric flap when a larger defect requires coverage, though this is not often the case in the upper extremity[15]. After pedicle mobilization, when a bipolar transfer is planned, the insertion on the humerus is released and sutures are placed in the tendon. In cases where a unipolar transfer is planned, the humeral insertion is left intact[1]. A bipolar transfer has the advantage of allowing proximal fixation to the coracoid, acromion, or lateral clavicle which can provide a more direct line of pull while stabilizing the shoulder[1].
Figure 1. External anatomic landmarks for harvest of the latissimus dorsi flap.
Figure 2. The pedicled latissimus dorsi flap after elevation.
To transfer the muscle to the anterior arm, the latissimus is tubularized. An incision is made over the coracoid, where the origin of the transferred muscle is planned. A subcutaneous tunnel is created connecting the posterior and anterior incisions, and the latissimus tendinous insertion is passed below the pectoralis major tendon to the coracoid where it is secured with sutures or suture anchors [Figure 3]. The remainder of the tubularized latissimus is passed to the anterior arm [Figure 4]. Care must be taken to avoid twisting the pedicle while passing the muscle, which may lead to flap ischemia[14]. To set the tension of the transferred latissimus, the muscle is stretched distally, the elbow is extended, and the distal latissimus is secured to the distal biceps tendon [Figure 5]. Since the marking sutures were placed with the latissimus in extension at the donor site, securing the muscle at the recipient site with the elbow in extension should be performed after re-establishing the 5 cm interval between marking sutures[14]. After securing the muscle, the shoulder and elbow are ranged to ensure there is not excessive tension on the pedicle. After closure, the shoulder is immobilized with an abduction pillow and the elbow is immobilized in 90 degrees of flexion[13,14].
Figure 3. Rotation of the pedicled latissimus dorsi flap to the anterior arm.
Figure 4. Planned inset of the pedicled latissimus dorsi flap to the anterior arm.
Figure 5. Inset of the pedicled latissimus dorsi flap.
Reported outcomes are shown in Table 1. The majority of patients achieved at least antigravity strength with pedicled latissimus transfer, with a low rate of reported complications. Of the studies reporting motor outcomes, 87% of patients achieved at least antigravity flexion strength. Range of motion was inconsistently reported in the literature. In the publications describing final elbow flexion, all but two reports revealed a mean postoperative elbow flexion of 90° or more.
Reported outcomes of pedicled latissimus dorsi transfer. MRC: Medical Research Council muscle grade
| Reference | Number of patients | Mean age (years) | Pathology | Elbow flexion MRC < 3 | MRC 3 | MRC ≥ 4 | Mean postop elbow flexion (degrees) | Complications | |
| Chuang et al.[16] | 10 | Not specified | Brachial plexus trauma | 0 | 4 | 6 | NR | None reported | |
| Haas et al.[17] | 2 | 20 | Upper arm amputation | 0 | 2 | 0 | NR | None reported | |
| Haninec et al.[18] | 2 | Not specified | Brachial plexus trauma | 0 | 0 | 2 | 90 to 120 | None reported | |
| Kawamura et al.[19] | 10 | 16.9 | 8 brachial plexus trauma 1 birth palsy 1 humeral fracture | 0 | 2 | 8 | 111 | None reported | |
| Martin et al.[20] | 4 (6 limbs) | Not specified | 4 congenital 2 brachial plexus trauma | 1 | 0 | 5 | 115 | 1 revision for muscle dehiscence 2 donor site seroma | |
| Moneim et al.[21] | 5 | 29.4 | Brachial plexus trauma | 0 | 1 | 4 | 92 | None reported | |
| O’Ceallaigh et al.[22] | 1 | 35 | Electrical burn | 0 | 0 | 1 | 80 | None reported | |
| Schoeller et al.[23] | 5 | 35.5 | Upper arm amputation | 0 | 2 | 3 | NR | None reported | |
| Stevanovic et al.[13] | 4 | 18 | Traumatic anterior compartment defect | 0 | 0 | 4 | 134 | 1 infected hematoma | |
| Vekris et al.[24] | 9 | Not specified | Brachial plexus trauma | 0 | 9 (distribution not specified) | NR | 2 skin necrosis and infection, distal insertion revision | ||
| Zancolli et al.[25] | 8 | Not specified | 2 brachial plexus trauma 6 poliomyelitis | 0 | 0 | 8 | 128 | None reported | |
| Hirayama et al.[26] | 7 | 33.3 | Brachial plexus trauma | Not specified4 excellent, 2 good, 1 failure | NR (4 could move hand to mouth) | 1 failure (fibrofatty degeneration of transferred muscle) | |||
| Rogachefsky et al.[27] | 1 | 39 | Traumatic anterior compartment defect | NR | NR | NR | 135 | None reported | |
| Eggers et al.[28] | 3 | 32 | Brachial plexus trauma | 0 | 0 | 3 | 132 | None reported | |
| Cambon-Binder et al.[29] | 7 | 29 | 4 traumatic anterior compartment defect 3 brachial plexus trauma | 1 | 1 | 5 | 91 | None reported | |
| Takami et al.[30] | 2 | 22 | Brachial plexus trauma | 0 | 0 | 2 | 127 | None reported | |
| Hochberg et al.[31] | 1 | 11 | Electric burn | NR | NR | NR | “complete” | None reported | |
| Germann et al.[32] | 3 | 28 | 2 traumatic anterior compartment defect 1 upper arm amputation | 1 | 0 | 2 | 105 | None reported | |
| Mordick et al.[33] | 1 | 16 | Traumatic anterior compartment defect | 0 | 0 | 1 | 110 | None reported | |
| De Moraes et al.[34] | 6 | 39 | Brachial plexus trauma | 1 | 4 | 1 | 73 | None reported | |
| Alshammari et al.[35] | 1 | 30 | Traumatic anterior compartment defect | NR | NR | NR | 120 | None reported | |
| Lupon et al.[36] | 1 | 25 | Sarcoma | NR | NR | NR | 140 | None reported | |
| Kameda et al.[37] | 1 | 29 | Brachial plexus trauma | 0 | 0 | 1 | 135 | None reported | |
| Sood et al.[38] | 1 | 77 | Sarcoma | 0 | 1 | 0 | NR | None reported | |
| Ma et al.[39] | 20 | 43 | Anterior compartment defect | NR | NR | NR | 16 excellent (134) 3 105+ 1 85 | 3 flap edge necrosis and wound breakdown | |
| Minami et al.[40] | 1 | 32 | Brachial plexus trauma | 0 | 0 | 1 | 135 | None reported | |
| Bostwick et al.[41] | 1 | Not specified | Musculocutaneous injury, anterior compartment atrophy | 0 | 0 | 1 | “full” | None reported | |
| Botte et al.[42] | 5 | Not specified | 3 brachial plexus trauma 1 upper arm amputation 1 arm crush | NR | NR | 3 | 109 | Not specified | |
| Stern et al.[43] | 10 | 19 | 3 Erb palsy 3 brachial plexus trauma 1 sarcoma 3 anterior compartment defect | 1 | 3 | 6 | 107 | 1 pedicle twisted and failed | |
Latissimus dorsi (free)
A free latissimus dorsi transfer allows more flexibility in use for restoration of elbow flexion, but it is technically more demanding than a pedicled transfer, given the need for microsurgical anastomoses. Either the ipsilateral or the contralateral free latissimus may be used. The contralateral latissimus dorsi muscle is considered in the event of atrophy or injury to the ipsilateral muscle. The approach and surgical dissection are similar to that described for the pedicled rotational latissimus transfer [Figure 6]; however, the patient needs to be repositioned to a supine position after the muscle has been harvested[9]. The latissimus muscle may be neurotized by the distal branch of the spinal accessory nerve, intercostal nerves, contralateral C7 nerve root, contralateral lateral pectoral nerve, or intact ipsilateral cervical nerve roots or intraplexal nerve branches[9,44]. Terzis et al. demonstrated increased postoperative mean muscle grade after neurotization of three intercostal nerves compared to two intercostals[44]. The thoracodorsal artery of the transferred latissimus may be anastomosed to the thoracoacromial artery, and the venae comitantes or cephalic vein may be used for venous outflow[9].
Figure 6. Harvested free latissimus dorsi flap.
Reported outcomes are shown in Table 2. In the studies reporting individual patient motor grades, 83% achieved at least antigravity elbow flexion strength. Mean elbow flexion was 72°.
Reported outcomes of free latissimus dorsi transfer. MRC: Medical Research Council muscle grade
| Reference | Number of patients | Mean age (years) | Pathology | Neurotization | Vessel anastomosis | Elbow flexion MRC < 3 | MRC 3 | MRC ≥ 4 | Mean elbow flexion (degrees) | Complications |
| Terzis et al.[44] | 37 | Not specified | Brachial plexus trauma | 15 intercostal 7 distal spinal accessory 4 cervical plexus 4 ipsilateral plexus 5 contralateral C7 1 contralateral lateral pectoral | Not specified | Mean muscle grade reported Intercostal 3.33 Distal accessory 3.05 Cervical plexus 2.8 Ipsilateral plexus 2.66 cC7 3.22 Contralateral lateral pectoral 2 | NR | 2 failures (in 42 transfers for elbow flexion and extension) | ||
| Doi et al.[45] | 4 | 21 | Brachial plexus trauma | Distal spinal accessory | Not specified | 0 | 0 | 4 | 90 | None reported |
| Doi et al.[46] | 3 | 32 | Brachial plexus trauma | Distal spinal accessory | Not specified | 0 | 2 | 1 | 83 | 1 recurrence of nerve palsy |
| Terzis et al.[47] | 20 | Not specified | Brachial plexus trauma | Not specified | Not specified | NR | NR | NR | NR | 3 hematomas 7 seromas |
| Minami et al.[40] | 2 | Not specified | Brachial plexus trauma | Intercostal nerves (4,5) | Not specified | 0 | 2 | 0 | 90 | None reported |
| Botte et al.[42] | 3 | Not specified | Brachial plexus trauma | Not specified | Not specified | 2 | 1 | 0 | 23 | Not specified |
Gracilis
The gracilis muscle is a commonly used donor muscle for a variety of upper extremity reconstruction indications. Either the ipsilateral or the contralateral gracilis may be used. In cases of double free functional muscle transfer used to restore multiple functions in the extremity, bilateral gracilis can be harvested. However, the direction of the vascular pedicle makes the contralateral gracilis a more desirable option. The gracilis provides knee flexion, internal rotation, and thigh adduction, but is redundant and does not lead to functional deficits in the leg when harvested. Additionally, it may be harvested with a skin paddle, and its length and excursion provide an ideal replacement for elbow flexors. One important aspect to consider when harvesting the gracilis is the short pedicle length. Determining the estimated pedicle length prior to flap harvest is of utmost importance to determine if the gracilis is a viable option. In the event that the pedicle length is insufficient, a vein graft may be utilized.
The surgical technique for free gracilis transfer has been well described in the literature[3]. The patient is placed in a frog leg position and an incision is created along a line from the pubic tubercle to the medial femoral condyle [Figure 7]. If a skin paddle is used, it is created in the proximal third of the incision and just posterior to the line. The gracilis is the most posterior adductor muscle of the thigh, and is differentiated from the sartorius by its origin on the pubic tubercle, rather than anterior superior iliac spine. The medial thigh fascia is incised and kept with the gracilis muscle to improve independent gliding during contraction. The distal tendon is identified and separated from the other tendons of the pes anserinus. As with the latissimus transfer described above, marking sutures may be used at fixed intervals to help define resting length. Proximally, the neurovascular pedicle is identified 8 to 12 cm distal to the pubic tubercle [Figure 8]. The pedicle is divided after exposure of the recipient site and division of origin and insertion of the muscle to minimize ischemia time[3]. Prolonged ischemia time should be avoided -- Martins-Filho et al. demonstrated a trend towards improved results in terms of muscle strength with decreased ischemia time[48]. Additionally, they noted a trend towards poorer functional outcomes with only one venous anastomosis compared to two[48].
Figure 7. The relevant anatomy and planned incision for harvest of the gracilis muscle.
Figure 8. Harvest of the gracilis muscle for free functional muscle transfer.
The recipient site is prepared with an extensile anterior arm approach including exposure of the lateral clavicle, acromion, and coracoid proximally, and the medial epicondyle and antecubital fossa distally [Figure 9]. The gracilis is attached proximally to the lateral clavicle and acromion or coracoid via suture anchors or bone tunnels. By fixing the muscle proximally first, the muscle can then be stretched to its resting length and the position of arterial anastomosis can be planned to avoid undue tension on the pedicle. Arterial anastomosis may be performed with the thoracoacromial, lateral thoracic, or subscapular arteries in an end-to-end fashion, or the brachial artery in an end-to-side fashion [Figures 10][3]. After anastomosis, distal gracilis is secured to the distal biceps tendon or the radius or ulna, with the restoration of the distance between the previously placed marking sutures while the elbow is held in extension
Figure 9. Planned incision for transfer of the gracilis muscle to the anterior arm.
Figure 10. Dissection of the donor artery in the anterior arm for transfer of the gracilis muscle.
Figure 11. Dissection of the distal biceps tendon for the distal attachment of the transferred gracilis muscle.
Following distal fixation, nerve coaptation is performed. The gracilis may be innervated by a variety of donor nerves, including the distal spinal accessory nerve, intercostal nerves, fascicles of the ulnar or median nerve, the phrenic nerve, or contralateral medial pectoral nerve[3]. In cases where elbow flexion was lost due to anterior compartment trauma or resection, the original musculocutaneous nerve may be used. The authors prefer neurotization with the distal spinal accessory nerve. The spinal accessory nerve is identified after detaching the trapezius insertion from the clavicle and the acromion. The distal branch of the spinal accessory nerve is divided and a coaptation is performed to the motor branch of the gracilis with microsurgical technique.
Reported outcomes are shown in Table 3. The majority of patients, 79% of those reported, achieved antigravity strength or stronger with free gracilis transfer, with a low rate of reported complications.
Reported outcomes of free gracilis transfer. MRC: Medical Research Council muscle grade
| Reference | Number of patients | Mean age (years) | Pathology | Neurotization | Vessel anastomosis | Elbow flexion MRC < 3 | MRC 3 | MRC ≥ 4 | Mean elbow flexion (degrees) | Complications |
| Silva et al.[53] | 87 | 30 | Brachial plexus trauma | 45 spinal accessory (4 using sural nerve graft) 10 intercostal nerves (3 with graft) 8 median nerve fascicles 22 ulnar nerve fascicles 2 phrenic nerve | Not specified | 32 | 30 | 25 | NR | 3 loss of skin monitoring signal 1 hematoma compressing pedicle 4 infections |
| Ikuta et al.[54] | 1 | 11 | Brachial plexus trauma | Intercostal nerves (3, 4) | Lateral thoracic artery, venae comitantes | 0 | 1 | 0 | 90 | None reported |
| Krakauer et al.[55] | 3 | 30 | Brachial plexus trauma | Intercostal nerves (3, 4) | Not specified | 1 | 1 | 1 | 72 | None reported |
| Chuang et al.[49] | 38 (34 gracilis, 4 rectus femoris, results combined) | 25 | 35 brachial plexus trauma 3 traumatic anterior compartment defect | 31 intercostal nerves (3 nerves in 23, 2 nerves in 8) 4 glossopharyngeal nerve 3 musculocutaneous nerve (biceps loss, intact plexus) | Lateral thoracic artery or thoracodorsal artery | 10 (results combined) | 28 | NR | None reported | |
| Chuang et al.[16] | 16 | Not specified | Brachial plexus trauma | Intercostal nerves | Not specified | 3 | 6 | 7 | NR | None reported |
| Barrie et al.[56] | 22 (15 single gracilis; 7 double gracilis) | 25 | Brachial plexus trauma | 5 spinal accessory 8 intercostal (3, 4) 1 intercostal (4, 5) 1 musculocutaneous 7 combination (spinal accessory and intercostal, double transfers) | 7 thoracoacromial 9 brachial 2 axillary 1 lateral pectoral 3 combination (thoracoacromial and brachial) | 2 | 4 | 16 | 105 | 5 failures |
| Kay et al.[57] | 33 | Median 4.8 (20 children) Median 34 (13 adults) | 13 obstetric brachial palsy 12 adult brachial plexus trauma 4 arthrogryposis 2 sarcoma 1 polio 1 radial dysplasia | 18 intercostal 12 fascicles of ulnar nerve 2 spinal accessory with graft 1 thoracodorsal | Brachial artery or posterior branch to triceps; vena comitans of brachial artery | 6 adults 3 children | 7 adults 17 children | NR | 3 microvascular failures 6 hematomas 3 infections 1 recipient dehiscence | |
| Sungpet et al.[58] | 3 | 28 | Brachial plexus trauma | Ulnar nerve fascicle | Brachial artery; cephalic vein | 0 | 0 | 3 | 110 | None reported |
| Armangil et al.[59] | 16 | 27 | Brachial plexus trauma | 12 spinal accessory nerve 2 medial pectoral 1 phrenic 1 intercostal (4,5,6) | Thoracoacromial artery, vena comitantes or cephalic vein | 5 | 11 | 63 | 2 flap failures | |
| Chen et al.[60] | 39 | 27 | Brachial plexus trauma | Spinal accessory nerve | Brachial artery, axillary artery, or subclavian artery | 2 | 8 | 29 | 107 | 1 flap failure 1 donor site hematoma |
| Dodakundi et al.[61] | 36 | 29 | Brachial plexus trauma | Spinal accessory nerve | Thoracoacromial artery, cephalic vein | 0 | 11 | 25 | 119 | None reported |
| Doi et al.[62] | 34 | 23 | Brachial plexus trauma | Spinal accessory nerve | Not specified | NR | NR | NR | 118 | None reported |
| Elzinga et al.[63] | 2 | 20 | Brachial plexus trauma | Spinal accessory nerve | Thoracoacromial artery and vein | 0 | 0 | 2 | NR | None reported |
| Hosseinian et al.[64] | 12 | 25 | Brachial plexus trauma | Contralateral medial pectoral nerve | Brachial artery, basilic vein | 4 | 1 | 7 | 25 | 2 unsuccessful |
| Yang et al.[65] | 47 | 26 | Brachial plexus trauma | 45 spinal accessory nerve 2 phrenic nerve | Brachial artery, axillary artery, or subclavian artery; comitantes vein | 5 | 1 | 36 | 106 | 2 thrombosis with flap failure (immediately received second transfer) |
| Maldonado et al.[52] | 39 (29 biceps attachment, 10 distal attachment) | 34 biceps attachment 25 distal (FDP/FPL) attachment | Brachial plexus trauma | 13 intercostal 26 spinal accessory | Thoracoacromial artery; cephalic vein | 10 (biceps) 0 (FDP/FPL) | 9 (biceps) 1 (FDP/FPL) | 10 (biceps) 9 (FDP/FPL) | 111 (biceps) 127 (FDP/FPL) | None reported |
| Potter et al.[66] | 13 | 32 | Brachial plexus trauma | Spinal accessory | Thoracocromial artery; cephalic vein | 0 | 0 | 13 | 102 | 1 venous congestion |
| Nicoson et al.[67] | 13 | 34 | Brachial plexus trauma | 4 spinal accessory 1 spinal accessory+ intercostal+ rectus abdominis 1 intercostal 3 intercostal + rectus abdominis 1 medial pectoral nerve 2 FCU fascicle of ulnar nerve 1 thoracodorsal | Thoracoacromial artery or brachial artery | 3 | 4 | 6 (mean 4.5 MPN, 4 TD, 3.3 intercostal, 3 SAN, 3 SAN + ICN, 2 FCU) | NR | None reported |
| Estrella et al.[68] | 42 | 29 | Brachial plexus trauma | 41 spinal accessory 1 intercostal nerve | Thoracoacromial artery; cephalic vein | 5 | 9 | 28 | 107 | 4 flap failures 1 peroneal nerve palsy 3 wound dehiscence 3 revision tensioning 2 skin flap necrosis 2 transient sensory disturbance at knee |
| El-Gammal et al.[69] | 15 | 102.5 months | Obstetric brachial plexus palsy | Intercostal nerves (4,5) Phrenic nerve Spinal accessory nerve | Not specified | 0 | 1 | 14 | 104 | None reported |
| Chim et al.[70] | 12 | 14 | Brachial plexus trauma | Intercostal nerves Spinal accessory nerve | Not specified | 1 | 3 | 8 | 79 (mean arc) | 2 elbow flexion contractures 2 arterial thrombosis (stage 2, double transfer) 1 wound dehiscence |
| Coulet et al.[71] | 12 | 26 | Brachial plexus trauma | Intercostal nerves | Not specified | 2 | 0 | 10 | 128 (partial injuries) 103 (complete injuries) | 2 failures |
| Sochol et al.[72] | 1 | 5 | Arthrogryposis | Branch to pectoralis major (lateral pectoral) | Thoracoacromial artery and vein | 0 | 0 | 1 | 140 | None reported |
| Martins-Filho et al.[48] | 23 | 33 | Brachial plexus trauma | 18 spinal accessory 3 intercostal nerve | 18 thoracoacromial artery 3 thoracodorsal artery 1 brachial artery | 5 | 9 | 9 | NR | None reported |
| Bertelli et al.[51] | 24 | 34 | Brachial plexus trauma | Median nerve fascicles or ulnar nerve fascicles | Radial artery; cephalic vein | 1 | 7 | 16 | 108 | 1 arterial occlusion 1 arterial wall rupture 1 epicondyle fracture (during Steindler flexorplasty) 4 hematoma |
| Madura et al.[73] | 17 | 13 | Brachial plexus trauma | Spinal accessory nerve | Thoracoacromial artery; cephalic vein | 0 | 3 | 14 | 119 | 3 bowstringing |
| Cho et al.[74] | 38 | 28 | Brachial plexus trauma | 18 spinal accessory nerve 20 motor fascicles of ulnar nerve | Thoracoacromial artery and vein | 12 | 9 | 17 | NR | 2 vascular impairment of skin paddle 2 infection |
| Nath et al.[75] | 24 | 10 obstetric 27 traumatic | 13 obstetric plexus palsy 11 brachial plexus trauma | 18 median nerve branch 5 radial nerve branch 1 ulnar nerve branch | Not specified | 8 | 11 | 5 | NR | NR |
| Kimura et al.[76] | 8 | 31 | Brachial plexus trauma | Spinal accessory or intercostal nerve | Anterior humeral circumflex artery, deep brachial artery, or thoracoacromial vessels | 4 | 0 | 4 | NR | None reported |
| Potter et al.[66] | 17 | 33 | Brachial plexus trauma | Spinal accessory nerve | Thoracoacromial artery; cephalic vein | 2 | 0 | 15 | 92 | 1 exploration for venous congestion |
| Yavari et al.[77] | 63 | 23 | Brachial plexus trauma | Contralateral medial pectoral nerve + sural graft | Brachial artery | 16 | 26 | 21 | NR | 2 flap failures |
| De Rezende et al.[78] | 21 | 32 | Brachial plexus trauma | Ulnar nerve fascicle | Thoracoacromial artery and vein | 3 | 5 | 13 | 86 | None reported |
Rectus femoris
An alternative option for free functional muscle transfer to restore elbow flexion is the use of rectus femoris. This may be useful when the gracilis muscles are unavailable for use, whether as a result of injury or after use for a different function. The rectus femoris is a fusiform muscle that generates more force than the gracilis, and may lead to stronger elbow flexion, though comparative studies are lacking[79].
An incision is created along the anterior thigh in line from the anterior inferior iliac spine to the patella. A skin paddle may be incorporated into the incision. The rectus femoris and sartorius muscles are identified below the fascia, and the sartorius is retracted medially. As mentioned above, marking sutures may be placed at fixed intervals to define the normal resting length of the muscle. The descending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex vessels and branches of the femoral nerve are identified medial to the muscle. The rectus femoris is then elevated from distal to proximal and lateral to medial with care to avoid injury to the pedicle. Distally, the muscle is divided 6cm above the patella to preserve the quadriceps tendon[79].
The recipient site is prepared as explained previously. The proximal end of the muscle is fixed to the coracoid or lateral clavicle and acromion with suture, suture anchors, or bone tunnels. As with the free latissimus and gracilis transfers, the pedicle anastomosis can be performed to an available artery in an end-to-end or end-to-side fashion. Similarly, tension is set with the elbow in extension to restore the distance between the previously placed marking sutures and the distal end of the transferred rectus is fixed to the biceps tendon. The donor nerve of choice is then sutured to the motor branch of the femoral nerve innervating the rectus femoris.
Reported outcomes are shown in Table 4. While there are fewer reported cases using a rectus femoris muscle transfer compared to latissimus or gracilis transfer, the results are promising. In the studies which reported individual distributions of motor grades, 83% achieved at least antigravity strength.
Reported outcomes of free rectus femoris transfer. MRC: Medical Research Council muscle grade
| Reference | Number of patients | Mean age (years) | Pathology | Neurotization | Vessel anastomosis | Elbow flexion MRC < 3 | MRC 3 | MRC ≥ 4 | Mean elbow flexion (degrees) | Complications |
| Chuang et al.[16] | 1 | Not specified | Brachial plexus trauma | Intercostal nerves | Not specified | 0 | 1 | 0 | NR | None reported |
| Akasaka et al.[80] | 11 | Not specified | Brachial plexus trauma | Intercostal nerves (3, 4) | Anterior circumflex humeral artery or profunda brachii artery; cephalic vein or brachial vena comitantes | 3 | 8 | 0 | 80+ in 8 100+ in 3 | 2 failures, thrombosis |
| Wechselberger et al.[79] | 1 | 22 | Brachial plexus trauma | Spinal accessory nerve | Brachial artery and vein | 0 | 0 | 1 | 110 | None reported |
| Doi et al.[81] | 7 | 25 | Brachial plexus trauma | Spinal accessory nerve | Thoracoacromial artery; cephalic vein | NR | NR | NR | 34 | 3 skin paddle necrosis |
| Terzis et al.[44] | 7 | NR | Brachial plexus trauma | 4 contralateral C7 2 intercostals 1 cervical plexus | Not specified | Mean muscle grade reported Intercostal 2.77 Cervical plexus 2.33 cC7 3.67 | NR | None reported | ||
Medial gastrocnemius
The medial gastrocnemius muscle is less frequently used as a free functional muscle transfer option for restoration of elbow flexion, which may be used if other donors are unavailable. The technique is described by de Moraes et al.[34] An incision is made from 8 cm proximal to the popliteal crease to 10 cm proximal to the medial malleolus. The septum between the two heads of the gastrocnemius muscle is identified and dissected, retracting the lesser saphenous vein and sural nerve laterally. Marking sutures may be placed at a fixed distance. The medial sural artery and nerve to the medial gastrocnemius, branching from the tibial nerve, are identified between the heads of the gastrocnemius. Proximally, the medial gastrocnemius muscle is divided at the medial femoral condyle, and distally at the musculotendinous junction[34]. Transfer to the recipient site is performed as described above. De Moraes et al. describe functional outcomes similar to pedicled latissimus transfer, where all patients achieved at least antigravity strength [Table 5][34].
Reported outcomes of free medial gastrocnemius transfer. MRC: Medical Research Council muscle grade
| Reference | Number of patients | Mean age (years) | Pathology | Neurotization | Vessel anastomosis | Elbow flexion MRC < 3 | MRC 3 | MRC ≥ 4 | Mean elbow flexion (degrees) | Complications |
| De Moraes et al.[34] | 7 | 28 | Brachial plexus trauma | Ulnar nerve fascicle Intercostal nerve Spinal accessory nerve | Thoracodorsal artery; thoracodorsal vein and cephalic vein | 0 | 3 | 4 | 83 | None reported |
DONOR VESSELS
The choice of the donor artery and vein to supply the transferred muscle is variable and depends on individual anatomy, the length of the harvested pedicle, and the presence of pre-existing injuries. The anastomosis may be performed in an end-to-end or end-to-side fashion, depending on the chosen vessels. A meta-analysis comparing end-to-end and end-to-side anastomoses showed no significant difference in flap failure[82]. For transfers to restore elbow flexion, the thoracoacromial artery (end-to-end) or brachial artery (end-to-side) are commonly chosen vessels due to proximity and size match [Tables 1-4]. Most importantly, ischemia time and tension on the pedicle should be minimized[48].
DONOR NERVES
As described above, there are a variety of options for innervation of functional muscle transfers for brachial plexus injuries. Mahmood et al. evaluated axon counts in the nerve to the gracilis and found that the spinal accessory or two or three intercostals are all sufficient for transfer to the nerve to the gracilis[83]. When the musculocutaneous nerve or other intraplexal nerves are present, these should be used to innervate the transferred muscle, such as when free functional muscle transfer is used for treating anterior compartment loss[49]. Silva et al. compared gracilis muscle transfers innervated by the spinal accessory nerve, intercostal nerves, median nerve fascicles, ulnar nerve fascicles, or phrenic nerves. Success rates were similar between groups, with an overall success rate of 65% achieving at least grade M3 strength[53]. Nicoson et al. performed gracilis transfers with spinal accessory nerves, intercostal nerves (with or without rectus abdominis nerves), medial pectoral nerves, thoracodorsal nerves, and fascicle of ulnar nerves. They found a mean recovery strength of M4.5 for medial pectoral, M4 for thoracodorsal, M3.3 for intercostal, M3 for spinal accessory, and M2 for ulnar nerve fascicles, but had limited numbers[67]. Cho et al. compared neurotization of gracilis transfers by spinal accessory nerves or motor fascicles of the ulnar nerve, with 83% of those with spinal accessory nerve transfer and 55% of those with ulnar nerve fascicles reaching M3 strength or greater, but the difference was not statistically significant[74]. Chuang et al. showed that transferring three intercostal nerves leads to earlier recovery of muscle strength and higher final power compared to those with two transferred intercostal nerves[49]. This group showed poorer results with the use of the spinal accessory nerve to innervate the free functional muscle transfer -- 0% achieving M4 strength (compared to 78% of those with three intercostal nerves treated). However, they note the use of a nerve graft interposition when using the spinal accessory nerve to achieve the appropriate length of the transferred nerve[49]. Kimura et al. also noted a higher number of patients reaching M4 strength when the nerve transfer was performed without an interpositional nerve graft[76]. Terzis and Kostopoulos prefer the use of latissimus dorsi or rectus femoris transfers in most patients because of the increased strength at recovery and inadequate muscle bulk of the gracilis[44].Similar to Chuang et al., Terzis and Kostopoulos also demonstrated increased strength after latissimus dorsi neurotization with three intercostal nerves compared to two[44].
Oliver et al. performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare free functional muscle transfers (gracilis, rectus femoris, and latissimus dorsi) innervated by either intercostal or spinal accessory nerves. They found no difference in success rate or muscle strength, with nearly 65% achieving at least grade M3 strength[84]. Despite the success seen with these nerve transfers, one should consider potential risks and complications. Though the use of intercostal nerves is commonly reported, the proximity to vital structures should be noted, as there have been reported pleural tears and effusions, acute respiratory distress syndrome, seroma formation, and rib fractures[85].
POSTOPERATIVE PROTOCOL
Following functional muscle transfer, patients are monitored closely for signs of flap failure, whether the transfer is pedicled or free. A skin paddle is useful in determining if early signs of flap failure are present, and may provide more successful flap salvage in the event of arterial thrombosis or venous congestion[86]. After functional muscle transfer, rehabilitation is vital to optimizing patient outcome. Typically, patients are placed in a splint postoperatively with the elbow in flexion for 1-6 weeks, following which patients begin passive therapy exercises to avoid contracture[3]. Doi et al. performed a trial with patients undergoing double free gracilis muscle transfer, comparing those with 6 weeks of immobilization to those with early passive mobilization after 1 week of splinting. They showed that none of the patients in the latter group required tenolysis, compared to 32% in the immobilization group, but the final range of motion was similar[62]. Following muscle reinnervation, retraining is required to train the patient to use the new elbow flexor properly.
CONCLUSIONS
Functional muscle transfer is a viable option to restore elbow flexion in the setting of brachial plexus injury, traumatic muscle loss, oncologic treatment, poliomyelitis, or congenital absence of motor function. Options include pedicled or free functional muscle transfers. Functional muscle transfer has the potential to significantly improve upper extremity function.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributionsPerformed literature review: Vakhshori V
Prepared manuscript: Vakhshori V, Azad A
Availability of data and materialsNot applicable.
Financial support and sponsorshipNone.
Conflicts of interestAll authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participateEthical approval was not applicable, and consent to participate was obtained.
Consent for publicationConsent for publication was obtained.
Copyright© The Author(s) 2023.
REFERENCES
2. Toussaint CP, Zager EL. The double fascicular nerve transfer for restoration of elbow flexion. Neurosurgery 2011;68:64-7.
4. Hovnanian AP. Latissimus dorsi transplantation for loss of flexion or extension at the elbow; a preliminary report on technic. Ann Surg 1956;143:493-9.
5. Schottstaedt ER, Larsen LJ, Bost FC. Complete muscle transposition. J Bone Joint Surg Am ;37:897-918; discussion, 918.
6. Manktelow RT, McKee NH. Free muscle transplantation to provide active finger flexion. J Hand Surg Am 1978;3:416-26.
7. Zuker RM, Egerszegi EP, Manktelow RT, McLeod A, Candlish S. Volkmann's ischemic contracture in children: the results of free vascularized muscle transplantation. Microsurg 1991;12:341-5.
8. Doi K, Kuwata N, Muramatsu K, Hottori Y, Kawai S. Double muscle transfer for upper extremity reconstruction following complete avulsion of the brachial plexus. Hand Clin 1999;15:757-767.
9. Stevanovic M, Sharpe F. Functional free muscle transfer for upper extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134:257e-74e.
10. Doi K, Muramatsu K, Hattori Y, et al. Restoration of prehension with the double free muscle technique following complete avulsion of the brachial plexus. Indications and long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:652-666.
11. Doi K, Kuwata N, Kawakami F, Hattori Y, Otsuka K, Ihara K. Limb-sparing surgery with reinnervated free-muscle transfer following radical excision of soft-tissue sarcoma in the extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1679-87.
12. Ihara K, Shigetomi M, Kawai S, Doi K, Yamamoto M. Functioning muscle transplantation after wide excision of sarcomas in the extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;358:140-8.
13. Stevanovic MV, Cuéllar VG, Ghiassi A, Sharpe F. Single-stage reconstruction of elbow flexion associated with massive soft-tissue defect using the latissimus dorsi muscle bipolar rotational transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016;4:e1066.
14. Pierce TD, Tomaino MM. Use of the pedicled latissimus muscle flap for upper-extremity reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000;8:324-31.
15. Mahajan RK, Srinivasan K, Bhamre A, Singh M, Kumar P, Tambotra A. A retrospective analysis of latissimus dorsi-serratus anterior chimeric flap reconstruction in 47 patients with extensive lower extremity trauma. Indian J Plast Surg 2018;51:24-32.
16. Chuang DC, Epstein MD, Yeh MC, Wei FC. Functional restoration of elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries: results in 167 patients (excluding obstetric brachial plexus injury). J Hand Surg Am 1993;18:285-91.
17. Haas F, Hubmer M, Koch H, Scharnagl E. Immediate functional transfer of the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous island flap for reestablishment of elbow flexion in upper arm replantation: two clinical cases. J Trauma 2004;57:1347-50.
18. Haninec P, Smrcka V. Reconstruction of paralyzed biceps brachii muscle by transposition of pedicled latissimus dorsi muscle: report of two cases. Acta Chir Plast 1998;40:41-4.
19. Kawamura K, Yajima H, Tomita Y, Kobata Y, Shigematsu K, Takakura Y. Restoration of elbow function with pedicled latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap transfer. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2007;16:84-90.
20. Martin S, McBride M, McGarry K, Eames M, Lewis H. A review of functional latissimus dorsi transfers for absent elbow flexion and supination. Shoulder Elb 2021;13:329-33.
21. Moneim MS, Omer GE. Latissimus dorsi muscle transfer for restoration of elbow flexion after brachial plexus disruption. J Hand Surg Am 1986;11:135-9.
22. O'Ceallaigh S, Mehboob Ali KS, O'Connor TP. Functional latissimus dorsi muscle transfer to restore elbow flexion in extensive electrical burns. Burns 2005;31:113-5.
23. Schoeller T, Wechselberger G, Hussl H, Huemer GM. Functional transposition of the latissimus dorsi muscle for biceps reconstruction after upper arm replantation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007;60:755-9.
24. Vekris MD, Beris AE, Lykissas MG, Korompilias AV, Vekris AD, Soucacos PN. Restoration of elbow function in severe brachial plexus paralysis via muscle transfers. Injury 2008;39 Suppl 3:S15-22.
25. Zancolli E, Mitre H. Latissimus dorsi transfer to restore elbow flexion. An appraisal of eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973;55:1265-1275.
26. Hirayama T, Takemitsu Y, Atsuta Y, Ozawa K. Restoration of elbow flexion by complete latissimus dorsi muscle transposition. J Hand Surg Am 1987;12:194-8.
27. Rogachefsky RA, Aly A, Brearley W. Latissimus dorsi pedicled flap for upper extremity soft-tissue reconstruction. Orthopedics 2002;25:403-8.
28. Eggers IM, Mennen U, Matime AM. Elbow flexorplasty: a comparison between latissimus dorsi transfer and Steindler flexorplasty. J Hand Surg Br 1992;17:522-5.
29. Cambon-Binder A, Belkheyar Z, Durand S, Rantissi M, Oberlin C. Elbow flexion restoration using pedicled latissimus dorsi transfer in seven cases. Chir Main 2012;31:324-30.
30. Takami H, Takahashi S, Ando M. Latissimus dorsi transplantation to restore elbow flexion to the paralysed limb. J Hand Surg Br 1984;9:61-3.
31. Hochberg J, Fortes da Silva FB. Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap to restore elbow flexion and axillary burn contracture: a report on two pediatric patients. J Pediatr Orthop 1982;2:565-8.
32. Germann G, Steinau HU. Functional soft-tissue coverage in skeletonizing injuries of the upper extremity using the ipsilateral latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96:1130-5.
33. Mordick TG, Britton EN, Brantigan C. Pedicled latissimus dorsi transfer for immediate soft-tissue coverage and elbow flexion. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1742-4.
34. de Moraes FB, Kwae MY, da Silva RP, Porto CC, de Paiva Magalhães D, Paulino MV. Evaluation of elbow flexion following free muscle transfer from the medial gastrocnemius or transfer from the latissimus dorsi, in cases of traumatic injury of the brachial plexus. Rev Bras Ortop 2015;50:660-5.
35. Alshammari SM, Alghamdi AA, Almarzouq SF, Shash HA. Successful elbow flexion reconstruction using latissimus dorsi muscle transfer following a road traffic accident and upper limb trauma. Am J Case Rep 2021;22:e933374.
36. Lupon E, Chevreau C, Lellouch AG, Gangloff D, Meresse T. Elbow flexion reconstruction after arm-sparing excision for high-grade triton sarcoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2020;14:103.
37. Kameda T, Soichi E, Yokota T, Konno SI. Restoration of elbow flexion with a pedicled latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap to a brachial plexus injury at the terminal nerve level. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019;7:e2472.
38. Sood A, Therattil PJ, Russo G, Lee ES. Functional latissimus dorsi transfer for upper-extremity reconstruction: a case report and review of the literature. Eplasty 2017;17:e5.
39. Ma CH, Tu YK, Wu CH, Yen CY, Yu SW, Kao FC. Reconstruction of upper extremity large soft-tissue defects using pedicled latissimus dorsi muscle flaps--technique illustration and clinical outcomes. Injury 2008;39:67-74.
40. Minami A, Ogino T, Ohnishi N, Itoga H. The latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap for extremity reconstruction in orthopedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;260:201-6.
41. Bostwick J 3rd, Nahai F, Wallace JG, Vasconez LO. Sixty latissimus dorsi flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;63:31-41.
43. Stern PJ, Carey JP. The latissimus dorsi flap for reconstruction of the brachium and shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:526-535.
44. Terzis JK, Kostopoulos VK. Free muscle transfer in posttraumatic plexopathies part II: the elbow. Hand 2010;5:160-70.
45. Doi K, Sakai K, Kuwata N, Ihara K, Kawai S. Reconstruction of finger and elbow function after complete avulsion of the brachial plexus. J Hand Surg Am 1991;16:796-803.
46. Doi K, Sakai K, Kuwata N, Ihara K, Kawai S. Double free-muscle transfer to restore prehension following complete brachial plexus avulsion. J Hand Surg Am 1995;20:408-14.
47. Terzis JK, Vekris MD, Soucacos PN. Outcomes of brachial plexus reconstruction in 204 patients with devastating paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1221-40.
48. Martins-Filho FVF, do Carmo Iwase F, Silva GB, et al. Do technical components of microanastomoses influence the functional outcome of free gracilis muscle transfer for elbow flexion in traumatic brachial plexus injury? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021;107:102827.
49. Chung DC, Carver N, Wei FC. Results of functioning free muscle transplantation for elbow flexion. J Hand Surg Am 1996;21:1071-7.
50. Wade SM, Nesti LJ, Wind GG, Howard RT, Souza JM. The inverted free functioning gracilis muscle transfer for restoration of elbow flexion following delayed presentation or failed primary nerve reconstruction of upper trunk injuries. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2020;24:26-31.
51. Bertelli JA. Free reverse gracilis muscle combined with Steindler flexorplasty for elbow flexion reconstruction after failed primary repair of extended upper-type paralysis of the brachial plexus. J Hand Surg Am 2019;44:112-20.
52. Maldonado AA, Romero-Brufau S, Kircher R N MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Free functioning gracilis muscle transfer for elbow flexion reconstruction after traumatic adult brachial pan-plexus injury: where is the optimal distal tendon attachment for elbow flexion? Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:128-36.
53. Silva GB, Lima MR, Cho AB, Iamaguchi RB, de Resende MR, Wei TH. Gracilis muscle transfer to elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries. Acta Ortop Bras 2020;28:165-7.
54. Ikuta Y, Yoshioka K, Tsuge K. Free muscle graft as applied to brachial plexus injury-case report and experimental study. Ann Acad Med Singap 1979;8:454-8.
55. Krakauer JD, Wood MB. Intercostal nerve transfer for brachial plexopathy. J Hand Surg Am 1994;19:829-35.
56. Barrie KA, Steinmann SP, Shin AY, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT. Gracilis free muscle transfer for restoration of function after complete brachial plexus avulsion. Neurosurg Focus 2004;16:E8.
57. Kay S, Pinder R, Wiper J, Hart A, Jones F, Yates A. Microvascular free functioning gracilis transfer with nerve transfer to establish elbow flexion. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1142-9.
58. Sungpet A, Suphachatwong C, Kawinwonggowit V. Transfer of one fascicle of ulnar nerve to functioning free gracilis muscle transplantation for elbow flexion. ANZ J Surg 2003;73:133-5.
59. Armangil M, Ünsal SŞ, Yıldırım T, et al. Outcome of free gracilis muscle transfer for the restoration of elbow flexion in traumatic brachial plexus palsy. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2021;32:633-41.
60. Chen J, Qin B, Wang H, Fang J, Yang J, Gu L. Functional outcome of contralateral C7 nerve transfer combined with free functional gracilis transplantation to repair total brachial plexus avulsion: a report of thirty-nine cases. Int Orthop 2022;46:1053-62.
61. Dodakundi C, Doi K, Hattori Y, et al. Outcome of surgical reconstruction after traumatic total brachial plexus palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:1505-12.
62. Doi K, Hattori Y, Yamazaki H, Wahegaonkar AL, Addosooki A, Watanabe M. Importance of early passive mobilization following double free gracilis muscle transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:2037-45.
63. Elzinga K, Zuo KJ, Olson JL, Morhart M, Babicki S, Chan KM. Double free gracilis muscle transfer after complete brachial plexus injury: First Canadian experience. Plast Surg ;22:26-9.
64. Hosseinian MA, Tofigh AM. Cross pectoral nerve transfer following free gracilis muscle transplantation for chronic brachial plexus palsy: a case series. Int J Surg 2008;6:125-8.
65. Yang Y, Yang JT, Fu G, et al. Functioning free gracilis transfer to reconstruct elbow flexion and quality of life in global brachial plexus injured patients. Sci Rep 2016;6:22479.
66. Potter SM, Ferris SI. Reliability of functioning free muscle transfer and vascularized ulnar nerve grafting for elbow flexion in complete brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017;42:693-9.
67. Nicoson MC, Franco MJ, Tung TH. Donor nerve sources in free functional gracilis muscle transfer for elbow flexion in adult brachial plexus injury. Microsurg 2017;37:377-82.
68. Estrella EP, Montales TD. Functioning free muscle transfer for the restoration of elbow flexion in brachial plexus injury patients. Injury 2016;47:2525-33.
69. El-Gammal TA, El-Sayed A, Kotb MM, et al. Free functioning gracilis transplantation for reconstruction of elbow and hand functions in late obstetric brachial plexus palsy. Microsurg 2015;35:350-5.
70. Chim H, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Free functioning gracilis transfer for traumatic brachial plexus injuries in children. J Hand Surg Am 2014;39:1959-66.
71. Coulet B, Boch C, Boretto J, Lazerges C, Chammas M. Free gracilis muscle transfer to restore elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011;97:785-92.
72. Sochol KM, Edwards G 3rd, Stevanovic M. Restoration of elbow flexion with a free functional gracilis muscle transfer in an arthrogrypotic patient using a motor nerve to pectoralis major. Hand 2020;15:739-43.
73. Madura T, Doi K, Hattori Y, Sakamoto S, Shimoe T. Free functioning gracilis transfer for reanimation of elbow and hand in total traumatic brachial plexopathy in children. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018;43:596-608.
74. Cho AB, Bersani Silva G, Pisani MJ, et al. Comparison between donor nerves to motorize the free functional gracilis muscle transfer for elbow flexion: Retrospective study of 38 consecutive cases in traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries. Microsurg 2019;39:400-4.
75. Nath RK, Boutros SG, Somasundaram C. Restoration of elbow flexion in patients with complete traumatic and obstetric brachial plexus injury after functional free gracilis muscle transfer: our experience and management. Eplasty 2017;17:e34.
76. Kimura LK, do Nascimento AT, Capócio R, et al. Microsurgical transfer of the gracilis muscle for elbow flexion in brachial plexus injury in adults: retrospective study of eight cases. Rev Bras Ortop 2011;46:534-9.
77. Yavari M, Mahmoudvand H, Nadri S, Rouientan A. Contralateral medial pectoral nerve transfer with free gracilis muscle transfer in old brachial plexus palsy. J Surg Res 2018;231:94-8.
78. De Rezende MR, Veronesi BA, Paulos RG, Cho AB, Ribak S, Junior RM. Free gracilis muscle transfer with ulnar nerve neurotization for elbow flexion restoration. Int Orthop 2021;45:689-96.
79. Wechselberger G, Hussl H, Strickner N, Pülzl P, Schoeller T. Restoration of elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury by free functional rectus femoris muscle transfer. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:e1-5.
80. Akasaka Y, Hara T, Takahashi M. Restoration of elbow flexion and wrist extension in brachial plexus paralyses by means of free muscle transplantation innervated by intercostal nerve. Ann Chir Main Memb Super 1990;9:341-50.
81. Doi K, Sakai K, Ihara K, Abe Y, Kawai S, Kurafuji Y. Reinnervated free muscle transplantation for extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;91:872-83.
82. Ahmadi I, Herle P, Miller G, Hunter-Smith DJ, Leong J, Rozen WM. End-to-end versus end-to-side microvascular anastomosis: a meta-analysis of free flap outcomes. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017;33:402-11.
83. Mahmood B, Marshall DC, Wolfe SW, Lee SK, Fufa DT. Cadaveric evaluation of myelinated nerve fiber count in the nerve to the gracilis muscle in relation to use as a free functional muscle transfer for elbow flexion. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020;36:311-5.
84. Oliver JD, Beal C, Graham EM, Santosa KB, Hu MS. Functioning free muscle transfer for brachial plexus injury: a systematic review and pooled analysis comparing functional outcomes of intercostal nerve and spinal accessory nerve grafts. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020;36:567-71.
85. Kovachevich R, Kircher MF, Wood CM, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Complications of intercostal nerve transfer for brachial plexus reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 2010;35:1995-2000.
Cite This Article
Export citation file: BibTeX | RIS
OAE Style
Vakhshori V, Azad A. Functional muscle transfer for restoration of elbow flexion: a review. Plast Aesthet Res 2023;10:36. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2022.78
AMA Style
Vakhshori V, Azad A. Functional muscle transfer for restoration of elbow flexion: a review. Plastic and Aesthetic Research. 2023; 10: 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2022.78
Chicago/Turabian Style
Vakhshori, Venus, Ali Azad. 2023. "Functional muscle transfer for restoration of elbow flexion: a review" Plastic and Aesthetic Research. 10: 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2022.78
ACS Style
Vakhshori, V.; Azad A. Functional muscle transfer for restoration of elbow flexion: a review. Plast. Aesthet. Res. 2023, 10, 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2022.78
About This Article
Special Issue
Copyright
Data & Comments
Data
0
Cite This Article 2 clicks
Like This Article 5
likes
Comments
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.